From: | Scott Moynes <scott(at)vmfarms(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WAL files not being recycled |
Date: | 2016-05-16 22:54:35 |
Message-ID: | CAF+q=e0Tojw3hNc4MVCtQvqovmnTSrSUzPi-F1jf_CvBsTZy4w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
wal_keep_segments is set to 32.
Here is the replication slot:
slot_name |
n6lbb2vmohwuxoyk_00018732_f58b5354_79ad_4e6e_b18b_47acb1d7ce1f
plugin | test_decoding
slot_type | logical
datoid | 18732
database | omitted
active | f
xmin |
catalog_xmin | 84884044
restart_lsn | 1B3/4300CA60
Can an inactive replication slot cause WALs to be retained?
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> Scott Moynes wrote:
> > I have a PostgreSQL server that is not recycling WAL files. Log files are
> > continually created and no old log files are ever removed.
> >
> > Running PostgreSQL v 9.4.8 with archive settings:
> >
> > archive_mode = on
> > archive_command = /bin/true
> >
> > Checkpoint logging is enabled and does not record any logs being
> recycled:
>
> See the wal_keep_segments option, as well as existance of any
> replication slot (select * from pg_replication_slots).
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
--
Scott Moynes
VM Farms
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Kehlet | 2016-05-17 00:14:46 | preventing ERROR: multixact "members" limit exceeded |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2016-05-16 22:46:05 | Re: WAL files not being recycled |