From: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on "Love Your Database" |
Date: | 2016-05-17 09:25:02 |
Message-ID: | CAEzk6ff2JyKJvtY5xtM_pyvwFdrXJMx3X7Wu4xHv_xGm5C5PhQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 17 May 2016 at 10:22, Achilleas Mantzios
<achill(at)matrix(dot)gatewaynet(dot)com> wrote:
> On 17/05/2016 12:16, Geoff Winkless wrote:
>>
>> On 17 May 2016 at 09:34, Pierre Chevalier Géologue
>> <pierrechevaliergeol(at)free(dot)fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> On this matter, I hear *very* often from such guys that the only reproach
>>> they have to PostgreSQL is that it does not come with a slick GUI like
>>> Access. PGAdmin does not suit their needs at all: they want to design
>>> their
>>> forms, directly write into the tables by using quick'n easy/dirty
>>> copy/paste
>>> from/to their Excel (yes, it is still lying around). I understand them,
>>> somehow.
>>> There are a few tools around, many proprietary ones, some Free/Libre
>>> ones,
>>> but they are still looking for a sort of Holy Grail that would definitely
>>> convince them. A standard client tool that would come with any
>>> PostgreSQL
>>> installation would please them. Some sort of psqlGUI, I guess.
>>
>> Why reinvent the wheel? I would say that putting the development
>> effort into the OpenOffice Base app would be time better spent.
>
> Sorry if I missed something but what's wrong with pgadmin3 ?
There's nothing wrong with pgadmin as such.
From the very email you just quoted:
>>> they want to design their forms
ie (as I understand it) they're after some sort of RAD tool.
Geoff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bráulio Bhavamitra | 2016-05-17 10:14:09 | Re: Columnar store as default for PostgreSQL 10? |
Previous Message | Achilleas Mantzios | 2016-05-17 09:22:29 | Re: Thoughts on "Love Your Database" |