Re: Why we lost Uber as a user

From: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
Date: 2016-07-28 10:58:45
Message-ID: CAEzk6fenkdBOLnc4rZPo+Q2sgcRWDEo08qKdBvc-V8Rvw9fnEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27 July 2016 at 17:04, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> Well, their big complaint about binary replication is that a bug can
> spread from a master to all slaves, which doesn't happen with statement
> level replication.


​I'm not sure that that makes sense to me. If there's a database bug that
occurs when you run a statement on the master, it seems there's a decent
chance that that same bug is going to occur when you run the same statement
on the slave.

Obviously it depends on the type of bug and how identical the slave is, but
statement-level replication certainly doesn't preclude such a bug from
propagating.​

​Geoff​

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vitaly Burovoy 2016-07-28 11:19:45 Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-07-28 10:21:00 Re: pg_upgrade: exit_hook_registered variable