Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
Date: 2025-03-06 13:30:13
Message-ID: CAEze2Wiap5v-H-5QqGq-=DBG99CK-RgHpQUFaU6TENh_+zCh_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 14:18, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> Hi! I got a query plan with a strange number of rows. Could you please
> help me understand it?
>
> To be honest I can't understand why 0.50 number of rows here?

Because the scan matched only ~(500 rows over 999 iterations = 500/999
~=) 0.50 rows for every loop, on average, for these plan nodes:

> -> Nested Loop (actual rows=0.50 loops=999)
> -> Seq Scan on tb (actual rows=0.50 loops=999)

And for this, it was 500 rows total in 1000 iterations, which also
rounds to 0.50:

> SubPlan 2
> -> Result (actual rows=0.50 loops=1000)
> One-Time Filter: ((ta1.id < 1000) AND (InitPlan 1).col1)

As of ddb17e38 (and its follow-up 95dbd827), we display fractional
rows-per-loop, with 2 digits of precision, rather than a rounded
integer. This allows a user to distinguish plan nodes with 0.49
rows/loop and 0.01 rows/loop, and that can help inform the user about
how to further optimize their usage of indexes and other optimization
paths.

Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-03-06 13:33:22 Re: log_min_messages per backend type
Previous Message Matheus Alcantara 2025-03-06 13:20:31 Re: log_min_messages per backend type