Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL
Date: 2022-04-23 14:49:03
Message-ID: CAEze2Wi_WsKqmCZV0e85eS64TdtgcdANDXTH+xUUD54om2i5hw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 at 00:51, David Christensen
<david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi -hackers,
>
> Enclosed is a patch to allow extraction/saving of FPI from the WAL
> stream via pg_waldump.
>
> Description from the commit:
>
> Extracts full-page images from the WAL stream into a target directory,
> which must be empty or not
> exist. These images are subject to the same filtering rules as normal
> display in pg_waldump, which
> means that you can isolate the full page writes to a target relation,
> among other things.
>
> Files are saved with the filename: <lsn>.<ts>.<db>.<rel>.<blk> with
> formatting to make things

Regardless of my (lack of) opinion on the inclusion of this patch in
PG (I did not significantly review this patch); I noticed that you do
not yet identify the 'fork' of the FPI in the file name.

A lack of fork identifier in the exported file names would make
debugging much more difficult due to the relatively difficult to
identify data contained in !main forks, so I think this oversight
should be fixed, be it through `_forkname` postfix like normal fork
segments, or be it through `.<forknum>` numerical in- or postfix in
the filename.

-Matthias

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-04-23 15:14:11 Re: [PATCH] Allow multiple recursive self-references
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-04-23 13:39:18 Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL