Re: Pruning never visible changes

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pruning never visible changes
Date: 2022-09-19 15:29:14
Message-ID: CAEze2Wi3w3AUXuKThF2-fpmWmxV6hPunEtqF=WymTVzBmJ5d6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 01:16, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Sept 2022 at 10:27, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > > A user asked me whether we prune never visible changes, such as
> > > BEGIN;
> > > INSERT...
> > > UPDATE.. (same row)
> > > COMMIT;
> >
> > Didn't we just have this discussion in another thread?
>
> Well..... not "just" :)

This recent thread [0] mentioned the same, and I mentioned it in [1]
too last year.

Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2031521.1663076724%40sss.pgh.pa.us#01542683a64a312e5c21541fecd50e63
Subject: Re: Tuples inserted and deleted by the same transaction
Date: 2022-09-13 14:13:44

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEze2Whjnhg96Wt2-DxtBydhmMDmVm2WfWOX3aGcB2C2Hbry0Q%40mail.gmail.com
Subject: Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic
Date: 2021-06-14 09:53:47
(in a thread about a PS comment)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Önder Kalacı 2022-09-19 15:31:55 Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-09-19 15:16:27 Re: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema