| From: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Floris Van Nee <florisvannee(at)optiver(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: non-HOT update not looking at FSM for large tuple update |
| Date: | 2021-03-19 18:42:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAEze2Wi2r86gWbM88nyTveKmVsKDRNeY1L+fNY3GcOX8qm+2Wg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 19:16, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 5:30 PM Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > This is slightly more verbose, but I think this clarifies the
> > reasoning why we need this a bit better. Feel free to reject or adapt
> > as needed.
>
> I like this in general, but still has some rough edges. I've made another attempt in v5 incorporating your suggestions. Let me know what you think.
That is indeed better.
I believe this is ready, so I've marked it as RFC in the commitfest application.
With regards,
Matthias van de Meent.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-03-19 18:52:47 | Replication slot stats misgivings |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2021-03-19 18:37:05 | Re: Proposal: Save user's original authenticated identity for logging |