Re: HOT readme missing documentation on summarizing index handling

From: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HOT readme missing documentation on summarizing index handling
Date: 2023-07-07 17:12:31
Message-ID: CAEze2WgVAnG3vSbaUmV+SKbExvhsD7dupdZZDXM9dSLhb4ZKAg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 19:06, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 7/7/23 18:34, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 00:14, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> The original text was really about on/off, and I'm not quite sure the
> >> part about "exception" makes this very clear.
> >
> > Agreed on both points. Attached an updated version which incorporates
> > your points.
> >
>
> Thanks, pushed after correcting a couple typos.

Thanks!

Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2023-07-07 17:42:57 Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2023-07-07 17:06:35 Re: HOT readme missing documentation on summarizing index handling