| From: | Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres upgrade 12 - issues with OIDs |
| Date: | 2021-05-09 23:26:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAEyp7J_hK=J94XHb8eruhjBgL8YNd4-a7rbBxbfYrf-2NRTrXg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 1:47 pm, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-05-08 at 13:37 +1000, Venkata B Nagothi wrote:
> > We are thinking to upgrade to PG 11 instead so that we can avoid doing
> ALTER TABLE.. SET WITHOUT OIDs.
> > Does that makes sense ? Please advise if there are any gotchas !
>
> It makes sense, but it means that you will have to face the same problem
> later.
> However, for upgrading from v11 with little down time you may be able to
> use
> logical replication.
Yes, we will have a lot of time to deal with the OID problem later, good
thing is we will be out of 9.5 with less trouble. Hopefully we will be on a
better replication architecture soon which will make it much easier for us.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
> --
> Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
>
> --
Regards,
Venkata B N
Database Consultant
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-05-10 05:51:24 | Re: Issue in PG start |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-09 22:23:12 | Re: Setting wal_keep_segments parameter |