From: | Venkata Balaji N <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Eduardo Piombino <drakorg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Disconnected but query still running |
Date: | 2015-07-14 01:06:26 |
Message-ID: | CAEyp7J88WZ0dQR5WRSbYyDQK9EURg5KGzNY4Y7=7q2-ssNS0ow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Eduardo Piombino <drakorg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I've read that that a query still running after a disconnection is
> normal, since the server won't realize about this disconnection until
> it needs to send some data back to the client, which is ok and
> understandable. But my question is, what happens when the query
> finishes? FYI, the query was an update, in what would be autocommit
> mode (no explicit transaction was open). Will the changes be commited?
> or rollbacked because it will detect the disconnection later on?
If the autocommit is on and the transaction is not with-in BEING-END block,
then, the changes should be committed. If the query/process detects the
disconnection later on, it simply hangs which needs to be killed manually
at the database end.
> In
> other words, is it worth waiting for this query to finish (it has been
> running for almost 7 hours now), or should I cancel it because it will
> irremediably be rolled back when the server finds theres no one on the
> other end of the tcp connection?
>
Generally, when the application session is killed abnormally, the query
still continues at the database end. If you want process not to continue
anymore at the database-end, then, you need to manually kill it at the
database end too using pg_cancel_backend() or pg_terminate_backend().
Regards,
Venkata Balaji N
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Ribe | 2015-07-14 01:15:12 | Re: could not create shared memory segment: Invalid argument |
Previous Message | Ryan King - NOAA Affiliate | 2015-07-14 00:49:59 | Re: could not create shared memory segment: Invalid argument |