From: | Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Colin Gilbert <colingilbert86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Appetite for Frama-C annotations? |
Date: | 2021-12-09 14:00:24 |
Message-ID: | CAEy3c_ScZ1rEgSeRZVemkN0dVem6-z8UJ7OGh+eM5X6L6LiKRA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi there,
I played a lot with frama-c a long time ago.
Frama-c annotations are very verbose and the result is highly dependent on
the skills of the annotator.
Keeping it up-to-date on such a large project with high-speed development
will be, in my very humble opinion, extremely difficult.
Perhaps on a sub-project like libpq ?
--
Laurent "ker2x" Laborde
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 3:45 PM Colin Gilbert <colingilbert86(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> I've been becoming more and more interested in learning formal methods
> and wanted to find a good project to which I could contribute. Would
> the development team appreciate someone adding ACSL annotations to the
> codebase? Are such pull requests likely to be upstreamed? I ask this
> because it uses comment syntax to express the specifications and some
> people dislike that. However, as we all know, there are solid
> advantages to using formal methods, such as automatic test generation
> and proven absence of runtime errors.
>
> Looking forward to hearing from you!
> Colin
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-12-09 14:01:43 | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
Previous Message | Neha Sharma | 2021-12-09 13:53:17 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |