pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?

From: Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?
Date: 2017-10-17 10:59:51
Message-ID: CAEy3c_S3XH7sVHEmf3exGuZt_AEWLtR09syEZW8EvGuG2wMcAw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Friendly greetings !

i remember an interesting talk from seagate at pgcon2015 about SMR disk
technology, and i use them for archive & backup (personal usage).

However, the highest capacity on the seagate archive product line (the one
using SMR) is 8TB.
Seagate have a 8TB ironwolf product at roughly the same price.
And a 12TB ironwolf, much more expensive since it's new, but 12TB
nonetheless.

But their SMR disk are still maxed at 8TB.

What's the point of the seagate archive now ?
Ironwolf, for the same public price, have better performance (obviously)
and, more surprising, a better MTBF.

I'm confused ...

Thank you :)

--
Laurent "ker2x" Laborde

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2017-10-17 11:38:30 Re: pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?
Previous Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2017-10-17 06:23:59 Re: Preventing psql from attempting to access ~/.pgpass file.