| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: partitioning and identity column |
| Date: | 2024-01-24 07:02:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAExHW5vbvyX7q=KoSCu3GLbzdUMUn36_URaHh5gCiLABF3zBYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 12:04 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Ok. Maybe just rephrase that comment somehow then?
>
> Please see refactoring patches attached to [1]. Refactoring that way
> makes it unnecessary to mention "regular inheritance" in each comment.
> Yet I have included a modified version of the comment in that patch
> set.
Sorry forgot to add the reference. Here it is.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-01-24 08:05:29 | Re: Add tuples_skipped to pg_stat_progress_copy |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2024-01-24 06:42:43 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |