| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression |
| Date: | 2024-09-09 10:13:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAExHW5vENrwR6JCyGqGK34oGkg78BoUSTXsV+E6AYX67SZVkRg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 10:42 AM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I have merged the two patches now.
>
894be11adfa60ad1ce5f74534cf5f04e66d51c30 changed the schema in which
objects in test genereated_stored.sql are created. Because of this the
new test added by the patch was failing. Fixed the failure in the
attached.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Test-pg_dump-restore-of-regression-objects-20240909.patch | text/x-patch | 12.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-09-09 10:22:50 | Re: Why don't we consider explicit Incremental Sort? |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2024-09-09 10:12:34 | Re: Add memory/disk usage for WindowAgg nodes in EXPLAIN |