| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8) operators | 
| Date: | 2020-04-23 16:27:43 | 
| Message-ID: | CAExHW5v20Y=RiDDO3W2YXLAh0MKW7=cSU980Ygt6Rx-d3vATNw@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:51 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose to introduce the +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8)
> operators. The + operator allows us to add the number of bytes into pg_lsn,
> resulting new pg_lsn. The - operator allows us to substract the number
> of bytes from pg_lsn, resulting new pg_lsn. Thought?
> I sometimes need these features for debuging purpose.
As it's presented in the patch I don't see much value in calling it as
LSN arithmetic. If we could do something like LSN of Nth WAL record
+/- <number of WAL records, n> = LSN of N+/- n th log record that
would be interesting. :)
-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-23 16:43:27 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? | 
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-04-23 16:23:02 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |