| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com" <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com" <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOCS - pg_replication_slot . Fix the 'inactive_since' description |
| Date: | 2024-09-04 13:18:39 |
| Message-ID: | CAExHW5uuNLcCLyO9bq8OsfvfJJgy2C09xH1icETscK6h_JQQFg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 11:34 AM David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Agree on sticking with “The time…”
>
> Thus I suggest either:
>
> The time when the slot became inactive.
+1. Definitely removes confusion caused by "since" and keeps The time
as subject.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-09-04 13:22:12 | Re: [PATCH] Avoid mixing custom and OpenSSL BIO functions |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2024-09-04 13:04:50 | Re: Commit Timestamp and LSN Inversion issue |