Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 11:59 AM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 5:53 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 1:25 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:11:25AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > > Okay, thanks for the feedback. We have been relying on diff -u for
> > > > the parts of the tests touched by 0001 for some time now, so if there
> > > > are no objections I would like to apply 0001 in a couple of days.
> > >
> > > This part has been applied as 169208092f5c.
> >
> > Thanks. PFA rebased patches.
>
> PFA rebased patches.
>
> After rebasing I found another bug and reported it at [1].

This bug has been fixed. But now that it's fixed, it's easy to see
another bug related to materialized view statistics. I have reported
it at [2]. That's the fourth bug identified by this test.

>
> For the time being I have added --no-statistics to the pg_dump command
> when taking a dump for comparison.
>

I have not taken out this option because of materialized view bug.

> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAExHW5vf9D+8-a5_BEX3y=2y_xY9hiCxV1=C+FnxDvfprWvkng@mail.gmail.com

[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAExHW5s47kmubpbbRJzSM-Zfe0Tj2O3GBagB7YAyE8rQ-V24Uw@mail.gmail.com

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat