From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |
Date: | 2023-07-28 12:44:45 |
Message-ID: | CAExHW5uCUSNTn421eH5d2pVDh-DM=SJ3sERsKu-aQrP6ZPh08g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 8:48 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Anyway, I was thinking about this a bit more, and it seems it's not as
> difficult to use the page LSN to ensure sequences don't go backwards.
> The 0005 change does that, by:
>
> 1) adding pg_sequence_state, that returns both the sequence state and
> the page LSN
>
> 2) copy_sequence returns the page LSN
>
> 3) tablesync then sets this LSN as origin_startpos (which for tables is
> just the LSN of the replication slot)
>
> AFAICS this makes it work - we start decoding at the page LSN, so that
> we skip the increments that could lead to the sequence going backwards.
>
I like this design very much. It makes things simpler than complex.
Thanks for doing this.
I am wondering whether we could reuse pg_sequence_last_value() instead
of adding a new function. But the name of the function doesn't leave
much space for expanding its functionality. So we are good with a new
one. Probably some code deduplication.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-07-28 12:56:34 | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-07-28 12:42:39 | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2 |