| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Memory consumed by paths during partitionwise join planning |
| Date: | 2024-02-06 12:51:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAExHW5uAdVev9CQYrdZ7w0xucqp2mYHPzcCx6EevegZVVgDbLQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 5:22 AM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > That looks pretty small considering the benefits. What do you think?
> >
> > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAExHW5stmOUobE55pMt83r8UxvfCph+Pvo5dNpdrVCsBgXEzDQ@mail.gmail.com
>
> If you want to experiment, please use attached patches. There's a fix
> for segfault during initdb in them. The patches are still raw.
First patch is no longer required. Here's rebased set
The patches are raw. make check has some crashes that I need to fix. I
am waiting to hear whether this is useful and whether the design is on
the right track.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Basic-infrastructure-to-link-unlink-and-fre-20240206.patch | text/x-patch | 9.4 KB |
| 0002-Actual-code-to-use-pathnode-referencing-inf-20240206.patch | text/x-patch | 15.9 KB |
| 0003-Local-variables-pointing-to-path-node-used--20240206.patch | text/x-patch | 1.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-02-06 12:59:18 | clarify equalTupleDescs() |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-02-06 12:38:55 | Re: Why is subscription/t/031_column_list.pl failing so much? |