Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date: 2025-03-28 11:20:54
Message-ID: CAExHW5tqr1YcfxSPMr22RtjhKQ=+G4oLGmWMT=bErSp+iijj4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 4:05 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Mar-28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>
> > No, that's losing some information like default installation and the
> > same version.
>
> You don't need to preserve such information. This is just a test name.
> People looking for more details can grep for the name and they will find
> the comments.

Ok. In that case what's wrong with the testname I have in the patch?

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-03-28 11:32:51 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Previous Message Rahila Syed 2025-03-28 11:10:44 Re: Improve monitoring of shared memory allocations