From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
Cc: | Ajay Pal <ajay(dot)pal(dot)k(at)gmail(dot)com>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) |
Date: | 2024-12-05 11:42:11 |
Message-ID: | CAExHW5tDDwUK0dVqFRyUag8UsABmFNWhz8E6AVPDV2BXJLsY5w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sorry, I forgot to attach patches. PFA the patches.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 4:38 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 7:29 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 10:08 PM Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 05/11/2024 16:41, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 3:48 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> > > <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Patches 0001 - 0006 are same as the previous set.
> > > 0007 - fixes all the problems you reported till now and also the one I
> > > found. The commit message describes the fixes in detail.
> > >
> > > Here's an updated patchset based on the latest HEAD.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have been looking at this patchset from a user's and standards' perspective and I am quite pleased with what I am seeing for the most part. I have not been looking much at the code itself, although I do plan on reviewing some of the code in the future.
> >
> > Thanks for looking at the patches.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > There are a few things that stick out to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > 1.
> > > I don't see any way to view the structure of of a property graph. For example:
> > >
> > >
> > > postgres=# CREATE TABLE objects (id INTEGER, color VARCHAR, shape VARCHAR, size INTEGER);
> > > CREATE TABLE
> > > postgres=# CREATE PROPERTY GRAPH propgraph VERTEX TABLES (objects KEY (id) PROPERTIES ALL COLUMNS);
> > > CREATE PROPERTY GRAPH
> > > postgres=# \dG propgraph
> > > List of relations
> > > Schema | Name | Type | Owner
> > > -------------------+-----------+----------------+-------------
> > > graph_table_tests | propgraph | property graph | vik.fearing
> > > (1 row)
> > >
> > > postgres=# \d propgraph
> > > Property graph "graph_table_tests.propgraph"
> > > Column | Type
> > > --------+------
> > >
> > > I don't really know what to do with that.
> >
> > Yes. It is on my TODO list. IMO we should just print the first line
> > property graph "...". There are no predefined columns in this
> > relation. And somehow redirect them to use \dG instead.
>
> \d+ propgraph prints the definition of property graph. I find \dG
> similar to \di which doesn't print the structure of an index. Instead
> \d+ <index name> prints it.
>
> In the attached patch series I have added patch 0008 to remove
> unnecessary header
> > > Column | Type
> > > --------+------
>
> It still prints an extra line but I haven't found a way to eliminate
> it. Hence 0008 is WIP. I have listed TODOs in the commit message of
> that patch.
>
>
> > >
> > >
> > > 2.
> > > There is a missing newline in the \? help of psql.
> > > HELP0(" \\dFt[+] [PATTERN] list text search templates\n");
> > > HELP0(" \\dg[S+] [PATTERN] list roles\n");
> > > HELP0(" \\dG[S+] [PATTERN] list property graphs"); <---
> > > HELP0(" \\di[S+] [PATTERN] list indexes\n");
> > > HELP0(" \\dl[+] list large objects, same as \\lo_list\n");
> > >
> >
> > Will fix that in the next set.
>
> Done. The fix is part of 0001 now.
>
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > I will continue to review this feature from the user's perspective. Thank you for working on it, I am very excited to get this in.
> >
>
> here's patchset rebased on 792b2c7e6d926e61e8ff3b33d3e22d7d74e7a437
> with conflicts in rowsecurity.sql/out fixed.
>
> >
> > 0001 - 0005 are the same as the previous set.
> > 0007 - has RLS tests. It is the same as 0006 from the previous patch set.
>
> This is same as the previous patchset.
>
> >
> > 0006 - is new addressing collation and edge-vertex link qual creation.
> > This patch adds code to store collation and typmod to
> > pg_propgraph_property catalog and propagate it to property graph
> > references in GRAPH_TABLE. Collation is used by
> > assign_query_collations and assign_expr_collations to propagate
> > collation up the query and expression tree respectively. typmod is
> > used to report typmod of property reference from exprTypemod().
> >
> > While finishing code to create vertex-edge link quals, I found that we
> > need to find and store the operator to be used for key matching in
> > those quals. I think we have to do something similar to what primary
> > key handling code does - find the equality operator when creating edge
> > descriptor and store it in pg_propgraph_element. I am not sure whether
> > we should add a dependency on the operator. I will look into this
> > next.
>
> 0006 in the attached patch series completes this work. Now we find the
> equality operators to be used for vertex-edge quals and save it in
> pg_propgraph_element catalog and also add a dependency between the
> edge element and the equality operators.
>
> 0008 - has WIP fix for \d and \d+
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0004-Fixes-following-issues-20241205.patch | text/x-patch | 31.2 KB |
0002-support-WHERE-clause-in-graph-pattern-20241205.patch | text/x-patch | 7.2 KB |
0003-Support-cyclic-path-pattern-20241205.patch | text/x-patch | 37.4 KB |
0005-Access-permissions-on-property-graph-20241205.patch | text/x-patch | 11.9 KB |
0001-WIP-SQL-Property-Graph-Queries-SQL-PGQ-20241205.patch | text/x-patch | 504.2 KB |
0008-WIP-Do-not-print-empty-columns-table-for-a--20241205.patch | text/x-patch | 14.1 KB |
0007-RLS-tests-20241205.patch | text/x-patch | 182.0 KB |
0006-Property-collation-and-edge-vertex-link-sup-20241205.patch | text/x-patch | 114.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-12-05 11:44:43 | Re: CREATE TABLE NOT VALID for check and foreign key |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2024-12-05 11:28:10 | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |