Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints
Date: 2025-02-25 04:33:07
Message-ID: CAExHW5t=nxtK1ZyRaNR=qT2VTZ_SjHsgvZdMtZvscJJaRgdFXQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 6:25 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Feb-21, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>
> > If I apply your patches, build binaries, I see failure. I reverted
> > your patches, built binaries, I don't see failure. I apply your
> > patches again, built binaries, it fails again.
>
> I can't reproduce the problem either. Are you running asserts disabled
> or enabled? Can you please share what upgrade problems are reported?

I have shared the relevant output from regress_*_ log in an earlier
email. Do you need something else?

> Do you have additional tests in pg_upgrade that aren't in the tree?

No. I did intend to run my dump/restore test but the test even without
those patches applied.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2025-02-25 04:43:26 Re: Proposal: Filter irrelevant change before reassemble transactions during logical decoding
Previous Message Ajin Cherian 2025-02-25 04:26:34 Re: Proposal: Filter irrelevant change before reassemble transactions during logical decoding