From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | José Neves <rafaneves3(at)msn(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CDC/ETL system on top of logical replication with pgoutput, custom client |
Date: | 2023-10-25 11:13:57 |
Message-ID: | CAExHW5sq5SzG4qNmipZwx8kKYaAOBrh7B3ASkFOAG=Fghc7r4w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:23 PM José Neves <rafaneves3(at)msn(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Ok, I see. In that situation is safe indeed, as the offset is lower than the current transaction commit.
> But I think that I asked the wrong question. I guess that the right question is: Can we receive a keep-alive message with an LSN offset bigger than the commit of the open or following transactions?
> Something like:
>
> BEGIN LSN001
> INSERT LSN002
> KEEP LIVE LSN006
> UPDATE LSN004
> COMMIT LSN005
>
> Or:
>
> KEEP LIVE LSN006
> BEGIN LSN001
> INSERT LSN002
> UPDATE LSN004
> COMMIT LSN005
> KEEP LIVE LSN007
>
AFAIU the code in walsender this isn't possible. Keep alive sends the
LSN of the last WAL record it read (sentPtr). Upon reading a commit
WAL record, the whole transaction is decoded. Till that point sentPtr
is not updated.
Please take a look at XLogSendLogical(void) and the places where
WalSndKeepaliveIfNecessary() is called.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-10-25 11:34:39 | Re: ResourceOwner refactoring |
Previous Message | a.rybakina | 2023-10-25 11:04:24 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |