Re: Does RENAME TABLE rename associated identity sequence?

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jason Song <pidaoh(at)g(dot)skku(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Does RENAME TABLE rename associated identity sequence?
Date: 2025-04-25 10:28:28
Message-ID: CAExHW5se9ppYZY8dfK9nOJVTmC8tPpnd2+DrwqP2eFzvS2kmPA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>
> I think it's up to the user to rename subsidiary objects if
> they wish to do so.
>

I absolutely agree.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2025-04-25 10:35:51 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Previous Message George MacKerron 2025-04-25 10:22:06 Re: Making sslrootcert=system work on Windows psql