Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Ajay Pal <ajay(dot)pal(dot)k(at)gmail(dot)com>, Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date: 2025-02-10 06:14:00
Message-ID: CAExHW5sGs_c1jmKiUSuG5nnKpiXQZCMJo6GC8ihxFGtj-ADFsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:22 PM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > I see you have added some negative tests - object not found tests, but
> > I didn't see positive tests. Hence I haven't added those changes in
> > the attached patchset. But we certainly need those changes. You may
> > want to submit a patch with positive tests. That code needs to be
> > fixed before committing anyway.
>
> The attached file adds the positive tests.

Hi Junwang,
Thanks for the patch, but please post it as a separate patch in the
full patch-set, otherwise CFBot gets confused.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2025-02-10 07:29:19 Re: should we have a fast-path planning for OLTP starjoins?
Previous Message Peter Smith 2025-02-10 06:10:14 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation