Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber

From: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber
Date: 2025-02-28 11:03:22
Message-ID: CAEudQArYy-J+_UmmkgwaBz9ZJJP9TskdgdK3YQD4ivux2LvS7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em qui., 27 de fev. de 2025 às 22:19, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
escreveu:

> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 10:23:31AM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Yeah, I also think it would look good like this.
>
> It's the least confusing option, indeed. I've reduced a bit the diffs
> and done that down to v16 for the pg_upgrade part where this exists.
>
Thanks Michael.

> Double-checking the tree, it does not seem that we have simolar holes
> now.. I hope that I'm not wrong.
>
I think so.

best regards,
Ranier Vilela

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-02-28 11:17:50 Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-02-28 10:39:31 Re: [BUG]: the walsender does not update its IO statistics until it exits