From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: table_tuple_lock's snapshot argument |
Date: | 2025-03-10 16:55:41 |
Message-ID: | CAEudQArUT1dE45WN87F-Gb7XMy_hW6x1DFd3sqdhhxP-RMDa0Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em seg., 10 de mar. de 2025 às 13:52, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
escreveu:
> On 10/03/2025 18:20, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Just for curiosity.
> > *RelationFindReplTupleSeq* on the same source, does not suffer
> > from the same issue?
> >
> > PushActiveSnapshot(GetLatestSnapshot());
> >
> > res = table_tuple_lock(rel, &(outslot->tts_tid), GetLatestSnapshot(),
>
> :facepalm: yep, it sure does, and FindConflictTuple() too. Thanks, I'll
> go fix those too.
>
Thanks.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-03-10 17:20:57 | Re: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2025-03-10 16:52:50 | Re: table_tuple_lock's snapshot argument |