From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Small miscellaneous fixes |
Date: | 2022-11-26 14:30:07 |
Message-ID: | CAEudQAr5tgAW2ZTNn-U7oMFbC_xTt0FtU2grt_JtTcf=dnH5hA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em sex., 25 de nov. de 2022 às 22:21, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
escreveu:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 01:15:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Is this something you want to follow up on, since you were involved in
> that
> > patch? Is the redundant assignment simply to be deleted, or do you want
> to
> > check the original patch again for context?
>
> Most of the changes of this thread have been applied as of c42cd05c.
> Remains the SIGALRM business with sig_atomic_t, and I wanted to check
> that by myself first.
>
Thank you Michael, for taking care of it.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-11-26 14:43:19 | Re: MSVC vs Perl |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-11-26 11:50:20 | Re: Avoid distributing new catalog snapshot again for the transaction being decoded. |