From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c) |
Date: | 2021-06-15 10:57:12 |
Message-ID: | CAEudQAqh6vn8WyL7MFULCOca08ZVEwTsgUFzP_OXvseYC7Uwkw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em seg., 14 de jun. de 2021 às 21:01, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:
> I took it a step further.
>
> Transactions
>
> HEAD patched
> 10002207 10586781
> 10146167 10388685
> 10048919 10333359
> 10065764,3333333 10436275 3,55021946687555
>
> TPS
> HEAD patched
> 33469,016009 35399,010472
> 33950,624679 34733,252336
> 33639,8429 34578,495043
> 33686,4945293333 34903,5859503333 3,48700968070122
>
> 3,55% Is it worth touch procarray.c for real?
>
> With msvc 64 bits, the asm generated:
> HEAD
> 213.731 bytes procarray.asm
> patched
> 212.035 bytes procarray.asm
>
> Patch attached.
>
Added to next CF (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3169/)
regards,
Ranier Vilela
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-06-15 11:05:42 | Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2021-06-15 10:40:46 | Re: [PATCH] Fix buffer not null terminated on (ecpg lib) |