| From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, ldh(at)laurent-hasson(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Big Performance drop of Exceptions in UDFs between V11.2 and 13.4 |
| Date: | 2021-08-22 23:16:31 |
| Message-ID: | CAEudQAqQw0Psg8W-44G9aad4Q0XennqM2tD0UEkKSBAs_cFt5Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Em dom., 22 de ago. de 2021 às 14:50, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> escreveu:
> Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> > This looks useful, thanks. It seems like maybe win64 builds are very
> slow
> > running this:
>
> > exec_stmt_block() /
> > BeginInternalSubTransaction() /
> > AbortSubTransaction() /
> > reschedule_timeouts() /
> > schedule_alarm() /
> > setitimer() /
> > pg_timer_thread() /
> > WaitForSingleObjectEx ()
>
> Hmm ... we should not be there unless there are active timeout events,
> which there aren't by default. I wonder whether either Ranier or
> Laurent have statement_timeout or some similar option enabled.
>
Tom, none settings, all default from Postgres install.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2021-08-22 23:44:34 | Re: Big Performance drop of Exceptions in UDFs between V11.2 and 13.4 |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2021-08-22 23:15:04 | Re: Big Performance drop of Exceptions in UDFs between V11.2 and 13.4 |