From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Avoid incomplete copy string (src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c) |
Date: | 2024-07-01 19:58:06 |
Message-ID: | CAEudQAqPePSd3z_U8SmZSYh2HVxy3OKCNCVn+ksFESQa1EwSvQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em seg., 1 de jul. de 2024 às 16:20, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
escreveu:
> > On 1 Jul 2024, at 21:15, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > On 2024-Jul-01, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>
> >>> - char name[MAXPGPATH + 1];
> >>> + char name[MAXPGPATH];/* backup label name */
> >>>
> >>> With the introduced use of strlcpy, why do we need to change this
> field?
> >>>
> >> The part about being the only reference in the entire code that uses
> >> MAXPGPATH + 1.
> >
> > The bit I don't understand about this discussion is what will happen
> > with users that currently have exactly 1024 chars in backup names today.
> > With this change, we'll be truncating their names to 1023 chars instead.
> > Why would they feel that such change is welcome?
>
> That's precisely what I was getting at. Maybe it makes sense to change,
> maybe
> not, but that's not for this patch to decide as that's a different
> discussion
> from using safe string copying API's.
>
Ok, this is not material for the proposal and can be considered unrelated.
We only have to replace it with strlcpy.
v7 attached.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v7-avoid-incomplete-copy-string-do_pg_backup_start.patch | application/octet-stream | 576 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-07-01 19:58:16 | Re: optimizing pg_upgrade's once-in-each-database steps |
Previous Message | Joel Jacobson | 2024-07-01 19:56:23 | Re: Optimize numeric multiplication for one and two base-NBASE digit multiplicands. |