| From: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Non-decimal integer literals |
| Date: | 2023-01-24 00:46:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAEudQAqGdfrh7TDQUAjeOHVKiE0b6M3vZv-+U4X-5Yvum4rDFg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.01.23 11:01, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> So I'm feeling quite good about the end result -- I set out hoping not
> to make performance noticeably worse, but ended up making it
> significantly better.
Hi Dean, thanks for your work.
But since PG_RETURN_NULL, is a simple return,
now the "value" var is not leaked?
If not, sorry for the noise.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| avoid_leak_value_numeric.patch | application/octet-stream | 824 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2023-01-24 00:47:47 | Re: Fix GetWALAvailability function code comments for WALAVAIL_REMOVED return value |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-01-24 00:46:12 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |