Re: significant jump in sql statement timing for on server vs a remote connection

From: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sbob <sbob(at)quadratum-braccas(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: significant jump in sql statement timing for on server vs a remote connection
Date: 2022-04-20 15:51:55
Message-ID: CAEudQAoihh3A_jYVLxe8QjmRrEguOqEG+rxLtfKacT+VQ0vVXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Em qua., 20 de abr. de 2022 às 12:16, Sbob <sbob(at)quadratum-braccas(dot)com>
escreveu:

>
> On 4/19/22 22:17, Jeff Janes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 5:00 PM Sbob <sbob(at)quadratum-braccas(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> However if we move the file to another server in the same network and
>> run with a psql -h then it runs for more than 10min.
>
>
> What is the ping time? Packet loss? You can't take for granted that the
> network is good and fast just because they are on the same LAN.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
>
> Here is the ping stats:
>
> --- db-primary ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3000ms
>
3000 ms?
Are sure that haven't packet loss?

regards,
Ranier Vilela

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wakandavision 2022-04-20 16:35:07 Re: Postgresql TPS Bottleneck
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2022-04-20 15:49:30 Re: Postgresql TPS Bottleneck