Re: Millions of tables

From: Greg Spiegelberg <gspiegelberg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit(at)tym(dot)im>
Cc: Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>, "pgsql-performa(dot)" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Millions of tables
Date: 2016-09-28 16:27:00
Message-ID: CAEtnbpVPrQebE===N0pTwWseRKLm5Z6dB212r1OJe3VVv3prsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <vit(at)tym(dot)im> wrote:

> Have you considered having many databases (e.g. 100) and possibly many
> postgresql servers (e.g. 10) started on different ports?
> This would give you 1000x less tables per db.
>

The system design already allows for many database servers. 40 is okay,
100 isn't terrible but if it's thousands then operations might lynch me.

-Greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-09-28 17:27:59 Re: Millions of tables
Previous Message Richard Albright 2016-09-28 16:05:19 Re: Millions of tables