From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Cc: | andreas(at)proxel(dot)se, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: date_trunc() in a specific time zone |
Date: | 2018-10-29 16:12:49 |
Message-ID: | CAEfWYyzr2VUZWjSAm6Q3iknhuKGQLO1uqnEFPZusfpcWRymv2w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:44 AM Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 29/10/2018 16:26, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> > On 10/29/2018 04:18 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> >> A use case that I see quite a lot of is needing to do reports and other
> >> calculations on data per day/hour/etc but in the user's time zone. The
> >> way to do that is fairly trivial, but it's not obvious what it does so
> >> reading queries becomes just a little bit more difficult.
> >
> > Hm, I am not sure if I see any major win from writing
> >
> > date_trunc('day', timestamptz '2001-02-16 20:38:40+00',
> 'Australia/Sydney')
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > date_trunc('day', timestamptz '2001-02-16 20:38:40+00' AT TIME ZONE
> > 'Australia/Sydney')
>
> Because I don't want '2001-02-16 00:00:00' (where?), I want the precise
> moment in time that that represents ('2001-02-16 13:00:00+00') so I can
> pull the correct rows out of my big table.
>
> This isn't for display purposes.
>
>
I'm a bit confused as to the use case. Wouldn't someone who wants
locally-based time-period ranges also want output displayed in the
corresponding zone both of which are already well handled in one place by
"set timezone..."?
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2018-10-29 16:40:26 | Re: date_trunc() in a specific time zone |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-10-29 16:08:38 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option |