Re: More cores or higer frequency ?

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: Jarek <jarek(at)poczta(dot)srv(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: More cores or higer frequency ?
Date: 2017-05-23 18:39:15
Message-ID: CAEfWYyw6d72mpLiaaOHbAjhNsGR+_pM3saTY8EWw5Y+3szwKWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

The answer, as always, is "it depends."

Can you give us an overview of your setup? The appropriate setup for small
numbers of long-running analytical queries (typically faster CPUs) will be
different than a setup for handling numerous simultaneous connections
(typically more cores).

But CPU is often not the limiting factor. With a better understanding of
your needs, people here can offer suggestions for memory, storage, pooling,
network, etc.

Cheers,
Steve

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Jarek <jarek(at)poczta(dot)srv(dot)pl> wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I've heavy loaded PostgreSQL server, which I want to upgrade, so it will
> handle more traffic. Can I estimate what is better: more cores or
> higher frequency ? I expect that pg_stat should give some tips, but
> don't know where to start...
>
> best regards
> Jarek
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jarek 2017-05-23 20:14:14 Re: More cores or higer frequency ?
Previous Message Jarek 2017-05-23 18:29:34 More cores or higer frequency ?