From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jarek <jarek(at)poczta(dot)srv(dot)pl> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: More cores or higer frequency ? |
Date: | 2017-05-23 18:39:15 |
Message-ID: | CAEfWYyw6d72mpLiaaOHbAjhNsGR+_pM3saTY8EWw5Y+3szwKWg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
The answer, as always, is "it depends."
Can you give us an overview of your setup? The appropriate setup for small
numbers of long-running analytical queries (typically faster CPUs) will be
different than a setup for handling numerous simultaneous connections
(typically more cores).
But CPU is often not the limiting factor. With a better understanding of
your needs, people here can offer suggestions for memory, storage, pooling,
network, etc.
Cheers,
Steve
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Jarek <jarek(at)poczta(dot)srv(dot)pl> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've heavy loaded PostgreSQL server, which I want to upgrade, so it will
> handle more traffic. Can I estimate what is better: more cores or
> higher frequency ? I expect that pg_stat should give some tips, but
> don't know where to start...
>
> best regards
> Jarek
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jarek | 2017-05-23 20:14:14 | Re: More cores or higer frequency ? |
Previous Message | Jarek | 2017-05-23 18:29:34 | More cores or higer frequency ? |