Re: Block level parallel vacuum WIP

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block level parallel vacuum WIP
Date: 2017-09-19 06:33:34
Message-ID: CAEepm=3dgZbYRvG=9UANx7-bvTVezjVA+OfdAxH7-gzBR6VjVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Since v4 patch conflicts with current HEAD I attached the latest version patch.

Hi Sawada-san,

Here is an interesting failure with this patch:

test rowsecurity ... FAILED
test rules ... FAILED

Down at the bottom of the build log in the regression diffs file you can see:

! ERROR: cache lookup failed for relation 32893

https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/277165907

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-19 07:12:59 Re: Simplify ACL handling for large objects and removal of superuser() checks
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-09-19 06:31:28 Re: GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.