From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Causal reads take II |
Date: | 2017-05-24 03:58:49 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=3ZTCeu8R9kBCwyaMWeAa6xkA9xhmtq775aHSHg1zFPFg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm wondering about status of this patch and how can I try it out?
>
> Hi Dmitry, thanks for your interest.
>
>>> On 3 January 2017 at 02:43, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
>>> wrote:
>>> The replay lag tracking patch this depends on is in the current commitfest
>>
>> I assume you're talking about this patch [1] (at least it's the only thread
>> where I could find a `replay-lag-v16.patch`)? But `replay lag tracking` was
>> returned with feedback, so what's the status of this one (`causal reads`)?
>
> Right, replay lag tracking was committed. I'll post a rebased causal
> reads patch later today.
I ran into a problem while doing this, and it may take a couple more
days to fix it since I am at pgcon this week. More soon.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mahi Gurram | 2017-05-24 06:02:14 | Re: Regarding Postgres Dynamic Shared Memory (DSA) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-05-24 03:25:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |