From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15290: Stuck Parallel Index Scan query |
Date: | 2018-07-23 08:46:33 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=2fYdJ5hsrEb8OH=MCb1-adn8c0_rnTafdhKFcumL1vug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:57 PM, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> - `ERROR: canceling statement due to conflict with recovery`, happened
> right when our problematic query started, same user
Ok, so that would explain how the master was cancelled. In 2877's
stack we see that it was aborting here:
#11 0x00007f539697ba5e in PostgresMain (argc=1,
argv=argv(at)entry=0x7f5398d1bbc8, dbname=0x7f5398d1bb98 "coub",
username=0x7f5398d1bbb0 "app") at
/build/postgresql-10-U6N320/postgresql-10-10.4/build/../src/backend/tcop/postgres.c:3879
That line calls AbortCurrentTransaction(), just after the call to
EmitErrorReport() that wrote something in your log. Andres's theory
(interrupts 'held') seems promising... perhaps there could be a bug
where parallel index scans leak a share-locked page or something like
that. I tried to reproduce this a bit, but no cigar so far. I wonder
if there could be something about your bloated index that reaches
buggy behaviour...
If you happen to have a core file for a worker that is waiting in
ConditionVariableSleep(), or it happens again, you'd be able to see if
an LWLock is causing this by printing num_held_lwlocks.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Victor Yegorov | 2018-07-23 11:42:52 | Re: BUG #15290: Stuck Parallel Index Scan query |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-07-23 08:19:14 | Re: BUG #15283: Query Result equal 0 for partitioned table |