Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE
Date: 2018-09-21 03:11:04
Message-ID: CAEepm=2bqGh6bYmbkmL98mqSJi75S9zYAF8AuFVyQFWj=nCs+g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 2:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > Andres pinged me off-list to point out this failure after my commit fb389498be:
>
> > ! FATAL: semop(id=332464133) failed: Invalid argument
>
> I was just looking at that, and my guess is that it was caused by
> something doing an ipcrm or equivalent, and is unrelated to your patch.
> Especially since skink has succeeded with that patch in several other
> branches.
>
> If it's repeatable, then it would be time to get excited.

I found this case from January:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skink&dt=2018-01-05%2000%3A10%3A03

! FATAL: semop(id=1313210374) failed: Invalid argument
! LINE 1: CREATE TABLE as_select1 AS SELECT * FROM pg_class WHERE relk...

EINVAL The semaphore set doesn't exist, or semid is less than zero,
or nsops has a nonpositive value.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-09-21 03:15:45 Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-09-21 02:59:29 Re: Strange failure in LWLock on skink in REL9_5_STABLE