From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: src/test/subscription/t/002_types.pl hanging on particular environment |
Date: | 2017-09-19 21:16:13 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=2ZUsH48mzNvZ5w3skyGMcjM6ORN3Zkdiu9iM1eeBBHSA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2017-09-18 21:57:04 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> WARNING: terminating connection because of crash of another server process
>> DETAIL: The postmaster has commanded this server process to roll
>> back the current transaction and exit, because another server process
>> exited abnormally and possibly corrupted shared memory.
>> HINT: In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the database
>> and repeat your command.
>>
>> As far as I know these are misleading, it's really just an immediate
>> shutdown. There is no core file, so I don't believe anything actually
>> crashed.
>
> I was about to complain about these, for entirely unrelated reasons. I
> think it's a bad idea - and there's a couple complains on the lists too,
> to emit these warnings. It's not entirely trivial to fix though :(
This type of violent shutdown seems to be associated with occasional
corruption of .gcda files (the files output by GCC coverage builds).
The symptoms are that if you use --enable-coverage and make
check-world you'll very occasionally get a spurious TAP test failure
like this:
# Failed test 'pg_ctl start: no stderr'
# at /home/travis/build/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/src/bin/pg_ctl/../../../src/test/perl/TestLib.pm
line 301.
# got:
'profiling:/home/travis/build/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.gcda:Merge
mismatch for function 94
# '
# expected: ''
I'm not sure of the exact mechanism though. GCC supplies a function
__gcov_flush() that normally runs at exit or execve, so if you're
killed without reaching those you don't get any .gcda data. Perhaps
we are in exit (or fork/exec) partway through writing out coverage
data in __gcov_flush(), and at that moment we are killed. Then a
subsequent run of instrumented code will find the half-written file
and print the "Merge mismatch" message.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2017-09-19 21:19:54 | Re: CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47 language tags. Should it? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-09-19 21:15:21 | Re: Show backtrace when tap tests fail |