Re: Size and size_t in dsa API

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Size and size_t in dsa API
Date: 2018-09-21 12:56:47
Message-ID: CAEepm=2CGs_xny4N+gqR2BpAnEbjT8vrAyECvKB62oR+xqAPpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:13 PM Ideriha, Takeshi
<ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >> As a non-expert developer's opinion, I think mixing of Size and size_t makes difficult
> >to understand source code.
> >
> >Agreed. Let's change them all to size_t and back-patch that to keep future
> >back-patching easy. Patch attached.
>
> Thank you for the quick action. I'm happy now.
> I confirmed English word Size in comment is kept as it is.

Pushed. Thanks for the reminder about that.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-09-21 13:55:01 Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE on standby servers
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-09-21 12:28:50 Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE on standby servers