Re: A few warnings on Windows

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A few warnings on Windows
Date: 2018-05-01 21:29:48
Message-ID: CAEepm=2AQxJENLfhZzU-=AcxmHXbDXV=kEdzPh7hjQrmmuHxWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yeah. In the wake of Peter's changes to use <stdbool.h> on other
> platforms, should we be enabling HAVE_STDBOOL_H for Windows?

It seems that header arrived in VC 2013. I will find the conditional
macrology for that.

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/vcblog/2013/07/19/c99-library-support-in-visual-studio-2013/

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-05-01 21:34:07 Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-05-01 21:29:35 Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?