Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process
Date: 2018-11-23 07:56:56
Message-ID: CAEepm=28t8_azxBmcvJ+cpRR6Kqv-PGzj1c-rKxeYcUMkzqjpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 2:27 PM Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the review.

Pushed.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2018-11-23 10:18:19 Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLock buffer_content lock
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-11-23 07:54:42 pgsql: Add WL_EXIT_ON_PM_DEATH pseudo-event.