From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Relax transactional restrictions on ALTER ENUM ... ADD TYPE (redux) |
Date: | 2018-10-08 23:54:19 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=249U4TT223CMr9U3ddDnSBNKwDNLCqEu_Aki=qXTXK1A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 3:30 PM Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 5:53 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > > Thanks. Here is a version squashed into one commit, with a decent
> > > commit message and a small improvement: the code to create the hash
> > > table is moved into a static function, to avoid repetition. I will
> > > push this to master early next week, unless there is more feedback or
> > > one of you would prefer to do that.
> >
> > Nitpicky gripes:
>
> Thanks for the review.
Pushed.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-10-09 00:38:54 | Re: DSM segment handle generation in background workers |
Previous Message | James Coleman | 2018-10-08 22:05:19 | Re: Partial index plan/cardinality costing |