Re: Continuous integration on Windows?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Continuous integration on Windows?
Date: 2017-10-12 22:46:16
Message-ID: CAEepm=1pQP+DOWVtCFA3FiPO5LgkWhUno5smT3Y71AMozfMuwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Actually, that didn't take too long.
>
> No testing yet, but this runs a build successfully:
> <https://gist.github.com/adunstan/7f18e5db33bb2d73f69ff8c9337a4e6c>
>
> See results at <https://ci.appveyor.com/project/AndrewDunstan/pgdevel>

Excellent! Thanks for looking at this, Andrew. It's going to be
really useful for removing surprises.

It would be nice to finish up with a little library of control files
like this for different CI vendors, possibly with some different
options (different compilers, different word size, add valgrind, ...).
I don't know if it would ever make sense to have standardised CI
control files in the tree -- many projects do -- but it's very easy to
carry a commit that adds them in development branches but drop it as
part of the format-patch-and-post process.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2017-10-12 23:02:05 Re: Extended statistics is not working on Vars hidden under a RelabelType
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-10-12 22:35:11 Re: pgsql: Add configure infrastructure to detect support for C99's restric