Re: Hash Functions

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hash Functions
Date: 2017-05-14 22:41:14
Message-ID: CAEepm=1nA9eKit2KEAJ_=aXEOE67RecewKYxW7RgwhEdjTEP5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> [2] https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.cbcux01/flotcop.htm#flotcop

Though looking more closely I see that the default is IEEE in 64 bit
builds, which seems like a good way to kill the older format off.
If/when someone gets PostgreSQL ported to z/OS it probably won't be
because they want to run it on an ancient 32 bit mainframe.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-05-15 00:05:24 Re: Hash Functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-14 22:38:52 Re: PG10 pgindent run