From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: kqueue |
Date: | 2016-04-22 22:12:12 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=1Uatzx_gm2UykK4kHrNHbr_RqDFgciqqF7Xm4od_SPAw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-04-22 20:39:27 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> While doing that I discovered that unpatched master doesn't actually
>> build on recent NetBSD systems because our static function strtoi
>> clashes with a non-standard libc function of the same name[1] declared
>> in inttypes.h. Maybe we should rename it, like in the attached?
>
> Yuck. That's a new function they introduced? That code hasn't changed in
> a while....
Yes, according to the man page it appeared in NetBSD 7.0. That was
released in September 2015, and our buildfarm has only NetBSD 5.x
systems. I see that the maintainers of the NetBSD pg package deal
with this with a preprocessor kludge:
What is the policy for that kind of thing -- do nothing until someone
cares enough about the platform to supply a buildfarm animal?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-04-22 22:25:06 | Re: kqueue |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2016-04-22 21:36:18 | Re: EXPLAIN VERBOSE with parallel Aggregate |