| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash |
| Date: | 2017-01-09 22:09:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=1SdZn3Q+qAfgQfHy_9Xacu_aP1VJ4vGV583Y33+aAsRQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> I will post a new rebased version soon with that and
>> some other nearby problems fixed.
>
> Here is a new WIP patch.
To make this easier to understand and harmonise the logic used in a
few places, I'm now planning to chop it up into a patch series,
probably something like this:
1. Change existing hash join code to use chunk-based accounting
2. Change existing hash join code to use a new interface for dealing
with batches
3. Add shared hash join support, single batch only
4. Add components for doing shared batch reading (unused)
5. Add multi-batch shared hash join support
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-01-09 22:23:06 | Re: Increase pltcl test coverage |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2017-01-09 21:45:57 | Re: Increase pltcl test coverage |