| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Creating a DSA area to provide work space for parallel execution |
| Date: | 2016-12-19 23:35:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=1Lj12iPn+L9A_PQtXakMAt1Wt_O5LtPoqes3woYnrVsw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Thomas Munro
>> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Here's a new version to apply on top of dsa-v7.patch.
>>
>> Here's a version to go with dsa-v8.patch.
>
> All right, so I've committed this, but not before (1) renaming some
> things that you added, (2) adding documentation for the new LWLock
> tranche, (3) not creating the DSA in the "simulated DSM using
> backend-private memory" case, and (4) some cosmetic tweaks.
Thanks! Hmm, so now in rare circumstances we can finish up running
ExecXXXInitializeDSM, but later have estate->es_query_dsa == NULL.
This is something to be careful about.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-12-20 00:46:24 | Re: Logical replication existing data copy |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-19 22:28:34 | Re: too low cost of Bitmap index scan |